JVC DLA-NZ800 compared with JVC DLA-NZ900
One table, both sets of published figures, and the same room check run against each. We do not name a winner: which of these is right depends on your screen and your room, and the two columns below are what you need to decide that for yourself.
Specifications
| JVC DLA-NZ800 | JVC DLA-NZ900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Brightness | 2,700 | 3,300 |
| Native contrast | 100,000:1 | 150,000:1 |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 98% |
| BT.2020 coverage | 73% | 73% |
| HDR tone mapping | Dynamic, per frame | Dynamic, per frame |
| Throw ratio | 1.43–2.92 | 1.35–2.75 |
| Lens shift | 80% | 100% |
| Lens memory | Yes | Yes |
| Anamorphic support | Yes | Yes |
| Interchangeable lens | No | No |
| 8K pixel shift | Yes | Yes |
| 3D | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 24 dB |
| Warranty | 3 | 3 |
Both in your room
JVC DLA-NZ800
Room fit: Check fit
Sold through authorised dealers
The maker does not publish a price for this market.
JVC DLA-NZ900
Room fit: Check fit
Sold through authorised dealers
The maker does not publish a price for this market.