JVC DLA-NZ900 compared with Sony VPL-XW8100ES
One table, both sets of published figures, and the same room check run against each. We do not name a winner: which of these is right depends on your screen and your room, and the two columns below are what you need to decide that for yourself.
Specifications
| JVC DLA-NZ900 | Sony VPL-XW8100ES | |
|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Brightness | 3,300 | 3,400 |
| Native contrast | 150,000:1 | Not confirmed |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | Not confirmed |
| BT.2020 coverage | 73% | Not confirmed |
| HDR tone mapping | Dynamic, per frame | Dynamic, per scene |
| Throw ratio | 1.35–2.75 | 1.34–2.87 |
| Lens shift | 100% | 85% |
| Lens memory | Yes | Yes |
| Anamorphic support | Yes | Yes |
| Interchangeable lens | No | No |
| 8K pixel shift | Yes | No |
| 3D | Yes | No |
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 26 dB |
| Warranty | 3 | Not confirmed |
Both in your room
JVC DLA-NZ900
Room fit: Check fit
Sold through authorised dealers
The maker does not publish a price for this market.
Sony VPL-XW8100ES
Room fit: Check fit
Sold through authorised dealers
The maker does not publish a price for this market.